School vouchers’ greatest impact

first_imgA new study on the impact of school vouchers on college enrollments shows that the percentage of African-American students who enrolled part time or full time in college by 2011 was 24 percent higher for those who had won a school voucher lottery and used their voucher to attend a private school.The experimental study, conducted by researchers at Harvard University and the Brookings Institution, compared two groups of students: a group that entered private schools with the help of a voucher program in New York City in 1997, and a control group that did not win vouchers. The attrition rate from the study over a 14-year period was less than 1 percent, making it highly unlikely that attrition from the study biased the findings. The study is available online.Matthew M. Chingos of the Brookings Institution and Paul E. Peterson, director of Harvard’s Program on Education Policy and Governance, tracked students entering grades K-five who participated in a foundation-funded New York City voucher experiment begun in 1997 until they were at least 21 years of age as of the fall of 2011. The researchers found that among African-Americans, only 26 percent attended college full time within three years of expected high school graduation if they did not receive the voucher opportunity. Among those who received the voucher, 34 percent attended college full time within three years, or an increase of about 31 percent.In the absence of a voucher offer, the percentage of African-American students who attended a selective four-year college was 3 percent. That increased by 4 percentage points if the student received the offer of a voucher, more than doubling the percentage enrolled in a selective college.In contrast to those results, Chingos and Peterson found only a small, statistically insignificant impact on the college enrollment decision of Hispanic students. The numbers of white and Asian students participating in the school voucher program were too few to permit separate analysis. When all students are combined together, no overall impacts can be detected.Peterson surmised that the difference between the results for African-American and Hispanic students could be due in part to the greater educational needs faced by African-American students.“Only 36 percent of African-American students went to college either part time or full time if they did not receive a voucher, whereas 45 percent of Hispanic students did,” Peterson said. “In other words, African-American students were at substantially greater risk of never going to college in the absence of a voucher.”The authors also found that the voucher offer had a larger impact on school quality (as reported by parents) among African-Americans than among Hispanic families.“The impacts on the college enrollment decisions of African-American students is striking, given the modest costs of the intervention, which came to a total of only $4,200 per pupil over a three-year period,” Chingos said. “A class size reduction intervention in Tennessee that had a similar impact cost $12,000 per pupil,” he added.The authors also said that religious considerations may have played a greater role in the choice of a school by Hispanic families than African-American ones, as Hispanics are more likely to be Catholic, the same religious affiliation as that of the majority of private schools in New York City. African-American students were especially at risk of not going on to college, note the authors, “and families sought a private school — even one outside their religious tradition — that would help their child overcome that disadvantage.”last_img read more

Paddington in the spotlight

first_imgTo access this article REGISTER NOWWould you like print copies, app and digital replica access too? SUBSCRIBE for as little as £5 per week. Would you like to read more?Register for free to finish this article.Sign up now for the following benefits:Four FREE articles of your choice per monthBreaking news, comment and analysis from industry experts as it happensChoose from our portfolio of email newsletterslast_img

Golazo! Why can’t Arsenal’s forgotten man do this for the Gunners?

first_img1 He was lauded as the ‘Japanese Messi’, but over the last four years Ryo Miyaichi has looked anything but, having failed to make an impression at the Emirates.As such, the 22-year-old has been farmed out on a string of successive loan spells, with his most recent seeing him pitch up at Dutch side FC Twente.While his appearances for the Eredivisie side have been few and far between, it does look as though he is starting to show some signs of developing into a half-decent footballer, if this goal for the club’s second side Jong Twente is anything to go by.With such ability like that in his locker, there will be a number of Arsenal fans wondering just why he hasn’t shown them anything similar. Arsenal’s Ryo Miyaichi on loan at FC Twente last_img read more